Accepted and presented papers will be considered for publication through the following channels:
All submissions will undergo a rigorous peer-review process. Publication in Scopus-indexed proceedings or journals will depend on the paper’s quality, reviewers’ recommendations, and compliance with the respective publisher’s standards and policies.
Editorial Policy
All submitted manuscripts will undergo a double-blind peer-review process conducted by members of the Scientific Committee. Each submission will be evaluated independently by at least two qualified reviewers with relevant expertise. All papers will first be screened for relevance, originality, and alignment with the conference scope.
Submissions that pass the initial screening will be assigned to reviewers based on their expertise, ensuring the absence of any conflict of interest. A manuscript will be considered for Scopus-indexed proceedings, Scopus-indexed journals, or non-Scopus proceedings, based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the quality of the manuscript, and the authors’ revisions.
Authors of manuscripts requiring revision will be invited to respond to reviewers’ comments and submit a revised version within a specified timeframe. The final decision on acceptance and publication channel will be made by the Editorial Board.
The conference adheres to ethical publication standards, including policies on plagiarism, data integrity, and originality. All submissions must be original and must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere.